can we watch it live anywhere? On line or TV?

It's on Sky pay-per-view  

Today's Gunfight at the not OK Corral:

• 1200: Home affairs committee to hear from Sir Paul Stephenson
• 1315 approx: John Yates to appear before home affairs committee
• 1430: Culture, media and sport committee to question Rupert and James Murdoch (On BBC2)
• 1530: Committee to question Rebekah Brooks (also on BBC2)

Radio5live will broadcast every word.

I do wander why Rebecah Ward was arrested before the inquiry. She can just keep her mouth shut in case she implicates herself. Mistake by the police or more collusion?

Very good question col...

They'll be more cover ups and evasions with some relatively minor pleb being thrown to the wolves.

Same old same old

James will be interesting.....

I will be glued even if its only to see the Murdochs and Ms Brooks sqirm.  I doubt that this Committee will be able to ask penetrating questions of Brooks since the police got there first (interesting eh) and  I don't expect honesty from the Murdochs ~ they are not known for it after all. 

 Sorry to appear cynical, but to me this is all staged for our benefit, to make us believe they are rooting out all that is wrong with the 'establishment'.  Hee haw!

What Aquarius said.

As others have said Murdoch and Brooks et al know where the bodies are buried both figuratively (and literally I suspect).

I can't see anyone in a position to cause them real harm actually doing it

You can see it all on the following link.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/democrac..._commons/default.stm

I doubt they will get much out of the Murdochs or Brooks.  They will admit to what there is clear evidence about and deny the rest.

Also as Brooks has been questioned by police she I suspect will repeatedly say she cannot answer certain questions as it may prejudice any possible criminal trial.

Thanks for the links and info - will try to catch up with it 

I'm not convinced Rupert, James and Rebekah will squirm under questioning.  They are all well rehearsed  in saying what they feel needs to be said to divert attention away from themselves.  For years they have stuck by the "One rogue reporter" theory until it was proved otherwise. They have the financial means to employ top legal advisors to advise them on potential questions and how they should reply.

I'm expecting carnage. 

Nice one VD.

Same here Blizz 

Met Chief's catchphrase - "I had no reason to think!" 

Here he comes....

Integriy intact  

He'll be playing off nine shortly.

 "I`m not sure we`re any clearer but the thank you for coming."  

"I was a post box"! 

A lot of 'defending of integrity ' going on and not much of anything else.

Don't doubt my integrity  

Them.

Not us  

I know!!!

My daughter is sitting here & couldn't believe he said that!    She said "Mum, is he saying everyone was putting things in him, as in he was being shafted?"

I said "no, just then he meant that he just relayed information, however, give it an hour & yes, he will probably be saying exactly that!" 

Just explain that his friend's daughter couldn't afford a stamp, so Yates agreed to hand deliver her CV.

This, of course, would not have any bearing on the outcome of her application, as both Yates and the head of HR were men of integrity. 

Oh, and the post box has a similar hat. 

It`s cowboy time!  

too late Blizzie..     the girl has now resorted back to her normal level of observation & comments..  

she wants to know who the slut is sitting just behind the Murdochs!  

she reckons she looks a bit like a postbox too 

He reminds me of my neighbour, crabby old man

We need the gaga jury on this case!

You called?

I'm pretty certain that's Murdoch sen. wife.

well..  I have some washing to sort out...   but I am ready to give my verdict already.. 

Guilty...   Guilty...  Guilty...  

I will consider sentencing as I am hanging out the washing!