ah well one rule for the HMs and another rule for the golden couple..

Dave along with JJ1JJ2 should all receive the punishment,it stinks.

I know I've criticised past BB's but this BB is a total farce....I can't wait for it finish so I can watch allstars BB.

Totally agree Maths.

Surely he shouldn't have nommed in the first place.

Noms disaster.

I don't dislike Dave as he can be very funny but his nom talk is so blatant I wonder why he's always surprised at the result. He thinks BB are picking on him but it's his own fault, he's still not learnt to stop talking noms

It's absolutely dire Senora. What a terrible way to bow out.

But John James never shuts up either and he hasn't been punished. It seems he's immune to punishment, and if he does receive any, its pathetic. You are looking at the chosen winner of BB11 - John James Parton

I personally think BB have a difficult job regarding the discussion of nominations. The HM's walk a very fine line sometimes, and it can be incredibly difficult to tell if they have broken the rules.

It would be much easier if they had a blanket ban on anything remotely connected to noms, but they don't. Probably because by allowing them to discuss some aspects it provides them with some good footage....and the opportunity to dish out a punishment here and there.

well let's look on the positive side...one less for Jo to compete with...I am hanging on to the vain hope that she will win, see the light and nom john james

Glad Dave is being punished but agree that JJ1 and 2 should be as well.

PEJ's little love in with JJJJ is beyond tedious now.

Perhaps you're right, but what I would prefer is a total standard set of rules, that if broken, will result in punishment. John James is obsessed with nominations and constantly talks about them, yet goes unpunished or receives a pathetic attempt at a punishment. There is no level playing field in this years BB. It is blatantly obvious that JJ can pretty much do what he wants without retribution. Its deeply unfair. I'm glad this is the last ever BB, its been destroyed for me by John James, Josie and the BB producers and editors.

They are allowed to talk about the SAR task they were all punished talking about Sam saying he will be nommed ..they could not nom him,a bit harsh saying Dave can not do the save and replace task or is it he can not choose Sam? that I can understand but he she be allowed to save himself like the others.

BB's upholding of the rules has been pretty flexible (and therefore unfair) in this series.
A bit of consistency wouldn't have come amiss.
I agree with Ducky's post (above)^^^
I don't often spot the subterfuge of nomination discussions, but even I have been able to see them clearly during this series.
If BB can't apply their own standards equally (and they can't) they should be ashamed of themselves.

Reference:

I'm glad it's the last BB ever too...... it's going out on a high for me. Last years was dire, imagine if that had been the last one ever.

Ducky on that we are in agreement, it was atrocious. One of the worst ever.

This BB is ending on such a sour note. Only Corin winning the main show or Aisleyne winning the Ultimate can salvage things for me now!

Kimota, can't predict who will win allstars, however its a sure fire bet that John James has it in the bag for BB11

It's been manipul;ated from the beginning and tbh I'm past caring....I will vote for Corin if she reaches the final...but I couldn't give a toss about the HMs now

I really don't think it is. I think Corin will win.

Ducky, your boy has it in the bag. I'd stake my house on it, thats how sure I am

I'll take that bet please!

Do you live somewhere nice?

I think his popularity peaked too early Fairfax, it's usually the "growers" that win. I do hope I'm wrong though

Last BB ruined and that's without a doubt...Between the producers,the biased editing,the underhand antics on Twitter and the like,they should just declare him winner now and be done with fgs....Will he EVER be able to say he won fair and square?,no!

Ah..... so that's going to be the post final argument is it?

I do as it happens, I think you would approve. Seriously, I cannot for the life of me see how the tide will turn now, it would actually take  JohnJ to use violence or walk out for him to loose. No Ducky, your Aussie baby is the winner. I'll remind you of this at the end of the show when he comes out of the house to fireworks.

*takes a second to dream*

He's not fave to win with the bookies though is he? (I haven't looked lately)

I could never feel the Aisleyne lurrrve, although I wasn't posting on C4 then

Good argument though,I'd have the same thing to say if the bias was so heavily unbalanced in any HM's favour,it's extremely unfair to the other HM's and insulting the intelligence of the viewers imo....Who wins?,They decide .

I've never gone for the biased HL's angle. Even in the days of Rexy boy getting a hard time.

I watch LF anyway.

FF how many times has he threatened to walk ?....Things don't go his way he does the petulant child routine,spits the dummy and threatens to walk,BB take on the lazy parent role ,placate him and molly coodle him some more.

She was a bit of a marmite character, it mostly depended on whether you believed 'the Ghetto Princess' persona was the real her or whether that was mostly 'character- armour ' and that her sweet side was her core personality!

I've got to agree with Maths, but the manipulation this year holds no bounds. 



JJ's odd are drifting, Sam's now overtaking him as 4th fav, then Josie closing the gap to Corin, going by DS.

They do that to all of them.

Everyday?....Most viewers don't,RL commitments prevent them doing so, as a result the HL's show is the basis for a lot of viewers opinion on HM's.

I'm going to win myself a house.

Most days. I didn't at the start of the series though, but nothing I've seen since has changed my opinion of ANY of the HM's, so my point is how biased can it really be?

you backed Sam, you crafty duck  

My opinion has changed on several of them,as far as he goes I find his behaviour more detestable by the day but each to their own.