Skip to main content

Reply to "Injunctions"

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing posted:

Although the injunction was temporarily lifted, the ban on reporting was made as 'JPS' (as he was known in court) was given time to appeal that decision. The appeal has been heard and a 4-1 decision has been made to uphold the original injunction. Thus we are basically back to square one and this sorry little episode is still 'a secret'.

presumably because if it's overturned it sets a precedent and the ones overturning probably have enough (even worse) skeletons of their own that they don't want out of the cupboards.  However - I don't give a monkey's who they're bonking but those two wee boys are going to find out anyway one day, so using them as the reason to silence the press is a waste of time

Kaffs
×
×
×
×
×