2048

Baz posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Baz posted:

2100 is the best I’ve done so far 

 That's pretty good.We shall have to see who does best between you, Yogi and moi. 

I think you’ve got a head start on us 

H iBaz 

Only about 24 hours head start.

I see your score is rapidly climbing. Have you worked out the way to build up the high score?

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Baz posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Baz posted:

2100 is the best I’ve done so far 

 That's pretty good.We shall have to see who does best between you, Yogi and moi. 

I think you’ve got a head start on us 

H iBaz 

Only about 24 hours head start.

I see your score is rapidly climbing. Have you worked out the way to build up the high score?

Not really  Don’t forget I am doing it on my iPad ...so don’t have the up and down buttons 

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

Eugene's Lair posted:

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

Way to go Eugene 

Eugene's Lair posted:

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

@Eugene's Lair

 

I am equally hated at work. Introduced it today and a number of colleagues have struggled to stay off the game. 

 

One of them has got to the elusive 2048, but he admitted he played it a few years ago and there is a system to completing it, he showed me his completed game.

 

BTW, anyone noticed that these are the numbers assigned to a binary word ?

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Eugene's Lair posted:

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

@Eugene's Lair

 

I am equally hated at work. Introduced it today and a number of colleagues have struggled to stay off the game. 

 

One of them has got to the elusive 2048, but he admitted he played it a few years ago and there is a system to completing it, he showed me his completed game.

 

BTW, anyone noticed that these are the numbers assigned to a binary word ?

OK: Finally made "2048", so I can finally put this - and myself! - to bed... 

Made "2048" with a score of 20,268. I don't know if the original Gabriele Cirulli version allows you to continue playing afterwards, but the (licensed!) version I'm playing does, so I finished with a final score of 28,168.

 

Yes, there are some basic techniques to playing: I wouldn't call them "fool proof" because there is a random element to the game, but they do help you more consistently achieve higher scores. If anyone wants me to go over them, let me know (I think EC understands some of the basics, but went a bit awry at the end there...   )

 

As for binary: well, the game's built on multiples of two, so...

Actually, "2048" was based on an earlier game called "1024" (mentioned above), but that in turn was based on a game called "Threes" - which is built on constructing multiples of *ahem* 3...

Eugene's Lair posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Eugene's Lair posted:

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

@Eugene's Lair

 

I am equally hated at work. Introduced it today and a number of colleagues have struggled to stay off the game. 

 

One of them has got to the elusive 2048, but he admitted he played it a few years ago and there is a system to completing it, he showed me his completed game.

 

BTW, anyone noticed that these are the numbers assigned to a binary word ?

OK: Finally made "2048", so I can finally put this - and myself! - to bed... 

Made "2048" with a score of 20,268. I don't know if the original Gabriele Cirulli version allows you to continue playing afterwards, but the (licensed!) version I'm playing does, so I finished with a final score of 28,168.

 

Yes, there are some basic techniques to playing: I wouldn't call them "fool proof" because there is a random element to the game, but they do help you more consistently achieve higher scores. If anyone wants me to go over them, let me know (I think EC understands some of the basics, but went a bit awry at the end there...   )

 

As for binary: well, the game's built on multiples of two, so...

Actually, "2048" was based on an earlier game called "1024" (mentioned above), but that in turn was based on a game called "Threes" - which is built on constructing multiples of *ahem* 3...

Well done Eugene. 

 

Now you have completed it, there is a version where you do it in reverse. 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Eugene's Lair posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Eugene's Lair posted:

Oh, EC: I don't know whether to thank you or hate you for posting this! 

I'd played it a while ago (or more accurately, an earlier version called "1024" - essentially the same game, but the tiles start at "1" and the target's 1024), and it is indeed horribly addictive.

I looked it up and apparently the game dates from 2014 - a bit earlier than I thought.

 

Unfortunately; as with other FMs I can't resist, so instead of continually accessing the site I've downloaded a Windows app version.

Still not reached the 2048 tile yet, but current highest score? 15,996... 

@Eugene's Lair

 

I am equally hated at work. Introduced it today and a number of colleagues have struggled to stay off the game. 

 

One of them has got to the elusive 2048, but he admitted he played it a few years ago and there is a system to completing it, he showed me his completed game.

 

BTW, anyone noticed that these are the numbers assigned to a binary word ?

OK: Finally made "2048", so I can finally put this - and myself! - to bed... 

Made "2048" with a score of 20,268. I don't know if the original Gabriele Cirulli version allows you to continue playing afterwards, but the (licensed!) version I'm playing does, so I finished with a final score of 28,168.

 

Yes, there are some basic techniques to playing: I wouldn't call them "fool proof" because there is a random element to the game, but they do help you more consistently achieve higher scores. If anyone wants me to go over them, let me know (I think EC understands some of the basics, but went a bit awry at the end there...   )

 

As for binary: well, the game's built on multiples of two, so...

Actually, "2048" was based on an earlier game called "1024" (mentioned above), but that in turn was based on a game called "Threes" - which is built on constructing multiples of *ahem* 3...

Well done Eugene. 

 

Now you have completed it, there is a version where you do it in reverse. 

 

Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Yogi19 posted:

Well done, Dame.

So far, I’ve only reached 1024, with a score of 15944 

 

 

once you work the method out Yogi it's quite simple to dop 2048 time and time again...it's the 4096 that's just out of my reach at the minute 

Dame_Ann_Average posted:

 

made one mistake the other day and blew it...I really want 4096

 

2048-5

 

Well done Dame. 

 

As you say, there is a technique to it. My colleague said for example if you mainly go left-right and down, never go up. But during my winning attempt I did go up a couple of times, made it harder, but I got there with some forward thinking. 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:

 

Well done Dame. 

 

As you say, there is a technique to it. My colleague said for example if you mainly go left-right and down, never go up. But during my winning attempt I did go up a couple of times, made it harder, but I got there with some forward thinking. 

 

Thanks EC 

 

Your friend does it completely different to me...I boobed when I pressed down instead of across, I thought I had 4096 in the bag 

Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:

 

Well done Dame. 

 

As you say, there is a technique to it. My colleague said for example if you mainly go left-right and down, never go up. But during my winning attempt I did go up a couple of times, made it harder, but I got there with some forward thinking. 

 

Thanks EC 

 

Your friend does it completely different to me...I boobed when I pressed down instead of across, I thought I had 4096 in the bag 

I still play it, finding it quite easy to rack up a decent score. 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Enthusiastic Contrafibularities posted:

 

Well done Dame. 

 

As you say, there is a technique to it. My colleague said for example if you mainly go left-right and down, never go up. But during my winning attempt I did go up a couple of times, made it harder, but I got there with some forward thinking. 

 

Thanks EC 

 

Your friend does it completely different to me...I boobed when I pressed down instead of across, I thought I had 4096 in the bag 

I still play it, finding it quite easy to rack up a decent score. 

Wish I could 

Add Reply

Likes (0)
×
×
×
×
×