I'm not reading all that !!!  

It would give me a headache 

First error is probably colourful

Yeah... I got colourful.

I think I've found and corrected 28 errors.

i fayled me inglush o levul furst tim

Quite a few spelling errors that I expect you've found, Rawky.  And should it be in-game tutorials rather than in game tutorials?

The whole thing is gobbledegook to me anyway!

Yeah, i'm pretty confident I got all the spelling errors. And it is in-game. I got that one too

The ones that throw me are the use of commas or semi-colons. I'm a bit useless in that area.

I'd put a comma after 'you' and and another after 'friends. 

and make a level that’ll keep you, and your friends, coming back again and again!

Befriend is spelt wrong

I got that one too.

Ooh, I missed that.

I've only read the first line . .I am rubbish at grammar but, I spotted a mistake already.

It might look cute and simple, but don’t be fooled; 

the comma should be after the 'but' . .no idea about colons and semi colons mid sentence. . I tend to guess when they are needed and am usually wrong..

Not read the rest tho. . too lazy

The commas after the "but" ? Are you sure?

 Create your own levels using the Wii GamePad touchscreen – adblocks, animals and other elements - with just a tap of the stylus!

Thanks. I wasn't so sure on that one.

I hate commas!

I think so. . it reads better that way . .i.e. a breath break?

Usually they come before an 'and' and after a 'but'  and often after a 'so'

I recall something from school about putting them before an 'and' .. it is when the bit from the 'and' and the closing comma can be missed out of a sentence and it would still make sense..

But, [<----- Comma ] as I declared I am no expert it's just what I see others doing so, [<---- another one]  I assumed it was correct

my head hurts

I suggest you teach Maths, it is a eck of a lot easier. . has strict rules and no room for doubt. .it's also a lot more interesting

http://www.grammarcheck.net/editor/

Perhaps that site could help, Rawks?

No commas with 'AND' and the comma comes before 'BUT'.

'But' is part of the sentence following it, not the preceding sentence.

I'm sure you will have picked-up on this one, however....

' various enviromental puzzles' should of course be ' various enviroNmental puzzles'

Yes, I got that, thanks.

So, you're saying that no commas should follow or before AND in this piece of text?

Yes, no commas before or after AND in that text.

'you also need to work out how each reaction interacts with other creatures too'

'ALSO' and 'TOO' mean the same thing, so you don't use them both in the same sentence. As you are not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition, then I would keep the 'also' and drop the 'too' from the end.

Do you mind if I ask why the no commas with AND?

Because that's the rules of grammar I was taught.

 Okay, thank you.

I was always taught no comma's with and...but times change, this might help Rawky and I'm sure you will be fine 

http://www.getitwriteonline.co...52709serialcomma.htm

The Serial Comma is also known as the "Oxford Comma". I was also taught not to have a comma between the last two elements in a list, but the problem with that is it can sometimes cause confusion. For example:

"My favourite puddings are apple pie, rhubarb crumble and jelly and ice cream." Is that "rhubarb crumble and jelly", or "jelly and ice cream"?

Another good one I just saw on a style guide is:

"I dedicate this work to my parents, Marie Smith and God."

I frequently have to supervise and proof read technical documents written by colleagues, and while I don't insist on the Oxford Comma I usually recommend it. The documents often contain long lists of equipment with complicated names and those reading them often don't have English as a first language, so it just helps avoid confusion.

I know what it's trying to get at, but if the parents were in fact Marie Smith and God, then there would be a colon after the word 'parents'.

If you read the link I posted Fluffy you might get my drift. I have seen academics use  *, and and* 

Oh I have! and my stance is still that if the information in the latter part is quantifying the former part, then a colon should be used and if it's just a comma then it means the latter part is ADDITIONAL information.

As with all things there are exceptions to the rules, but why have rules in the first place if all we're going to do is shrug our shoulders every now and then and say "Well, you know.......things change!"

I'll bow out and agree to disagree,, 

Not all rules are perfect though, and ultimately the objective is to allow clear communication and avoid confusion. The "Marie Smith and God" example wasn't perhaps the best (I just saw it in a style guide and thought it was funny), but the "favourite pudding" example is perhaps better: it looks clumsy and difficult to read without the Oxford comma.

Quite a few spelling and grammar rules aren't actually "rules" at all, but just conventions that go in and out of fashion. An example of this is Oxford spelling which, in very simple terms, prefers -ize word endings to -ise. I always use Oxford spelling, but Cambridge spelling (favouring -ise) has become increasingly popular in recent years.